PROFESSIONALS

Energy Compliance

TRUE ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Well-intentioned building codes have ignored the TRUE energy performance of windows and doors. This instructional video provides a common sense method to bring honest context into the conversation.

Watch Video
Energy Code Compliance
The Energy Code Trap
Energy Guidelines
Energy Compliance vs. TRUE Efficiency
A home’s energy efficiency is an important factor when selecting products, but energy compliance may
not equal TRUE efficiency. Why? Because windows and glass doors are measured in “U” while the
remaining envelope components are measured in “R”.

 

This document aims to point out the differences in energy rating values and how they represent the TRUE
efficiency of a window or door, and help decision makers avoid “The Energy Code Trap.”

 

 

Definitions

 

U-value/U-factor: “The measure of heat transfer through a glass window due to differences in indoor
and outdoor air temperature”. In other words, a lower number indicates better energy efficiency.

 

R-value: “The measure of heat flow resistance in a material”. In other words, a higher number indicates
better energy efficiency.

 

 

TRUE Efficiency: U-value vs. R-value

 

R-value is used to measure the energy efficiency of most every house envelope component, e.g. walls,
slab, but not the windows or doors that are part of the same envelope. An R-value difference of 1-2 points
is infinitesimal as it relates to overall efficiency and energy compliance. When reviewing a U-value as an
R-value (R-value = 1/U-value), we see that what might be considered an “inefficient” U-value is actually
a negligible loss if the same value drop is applied to the wall surrounding that same window.

 

 

Example Conversions
.32 U-value = 3.1 R-value, or R-3
.50 U-value = 2.0 R-value, or R-2
1.0 U-value = 1.0 R-value, or R-1

 

 

Although R-value is not typically used as a measurement for glazed products, both U-value and R-value
measure resistance to heat transfer. Fleetwood defines both here to illustrate how a seemingly large loss in
U-value does not directly correlate to notably poorer efficiency.